State v. Judd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mandatory re- porting statute “only abrogate[d] privilege[] . . . to the extent that a report be submitted,” and not “for the purpose of admitting evidence in a judicial proceeding”
• holding that a mandatory re- porting statute “only abrogate[d] privilege[] . . . to the extent that a report be submitted,” and not “for the purpose of admitting evidence in a judicial proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• United States v. Beauge
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2022-03-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuela
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-24· cited 71×
• Oak Crest Construction Co. v. Austin Mutual Insurance
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-02-17· cited 27×
• Burley v. Clackamas Cnty.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-10· cited 21×
• Oak Crest Construction Co. v. Austin Mutual Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-08· cited 9×
• State v. Wenning
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-02· cited 1×