Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/25/2002

State v. Juarez

Citations

55 P.3d 784
203 Ariz. 441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the Arizona Constitution and case law grant privacy rights only to defendants who can “establish a legitimate expectation of privacy”
“Arizona courts have consistently applied the Fourth Amendment’s ‘legitimate expectation of privacy’ requirement when determining unlawful search or seizure claims made pursuant to Article 2, Section 8.”
except in home search context, protections of Arizona Constitution concomitant with those of federal constitution
except in home search context, protections of article II, § 8 concomitant with federal constitution
defendant may not challenge a search if he does not have an expectation of privacy in the location searched
“Arizona courts have consistently applied the Fourth Amendment’s ‘legitimate expectation of privacy’ requirement when determining unlawful search or seizure claims made pursuant to Article 2, Section 8.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker, Daniel, Hall, Sheldon, Weisberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.