State v. J.R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Furtively carrying a dangerous weapon with intent to conceal is not an element of RCW 9.41.280.”
• “We conclude that all weapons described in RCW 9.41.250 are ‘dangerous weapons’ for purposes of RCW 9.41.280”
• “[I]f J.R. had been charged under RCW 9.41.250(2), the State would have had to prove J.R. carried the dagger ‘[f]urtively…with intent to conceal.’” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. JR
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-29
• State v. J.R.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-07

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
• State v. Chapman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-04-27· cited 112×
• State v. Echeverria
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-17· cited 66×
• State v. Myles
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-11-14· cited 62×
• State v. Myles
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-09-06· cited 8×
• State v. C.Q.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-28· cited 5×