State v. Joseph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that the offers of repayment were made [a]fter the acts were committed, and only after the defendant was confronted with the accusations, does not exonerate him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Edgar
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-06-24· cited 22×
• State v. Agnew
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-04-21· cited 17×
• State v. Duffy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-09-18· cited 15×
• State v. Jahns
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-06-07· cited 8×
• State v. Buelna
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-12-31· cited 5×
• State ex rel. Hyder v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-01· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• State v. Kruchten
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-08-02· cited 109×
• State v. O'Dell Fowler
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-01-04· cited 34×
• State v. Jackson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-11-23· cited 32×
• Whitson v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 27×
• State v. Zaragosa
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-07-28· cited 22×
• State v. Marsin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1957-02-19· cited 20×
• State v. Cravin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-10-14· cited 20×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-12-06· cited 15×