Arizona Supreme Court· 11/23/1966
State v. Jackson
Citations
- 420 P.2d 270
- 101 Ariz. 399
- 1966 Ariz. LEXIS 359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining a wrongful taking of property without apparent intent to return it or explanatory circumstances indicates intent to permanently deprive
- intent to permanently deprive can be inferred from unexplained or unsatisfactory explanation of taking property without consent
- intent to permanently deprive can be inferred from unexplained or unsatisfactory explanation of taking property without consent
- “The trial judge, in the absence of a satisfactory explanation, not only could have disregarded appellant’s testimony, but also could have inferred from its unsatisfactory nature, that there was no apparent intent to return the automobile.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Struckmeyer, Bernstein, Udall, Lockwood, McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1977-07-26· cited 79×
- State v. PedersonArizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-09· cited 58×
- Wells v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 37×
- State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court· 1967-11-02· cited 35×
- Gregory M. Toth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2015-07-16· cited 29×
- State v. BrookshireArizona Supreme Court· 1971-02-10· cited 25×
- State v. VillegasArizona Supreme Court· 1966-11-30· cited 24×
- Carlos Yammon Pena v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2013-01-11· cited 19×
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-12-27· cited 13×
- Pueblo v. Concepción SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1973-01-08· cited 13×
- State v. BouillonArizona Supreme Court· 1975-09-30· cited 11×
- State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-26· cited 8×
- State v. FlowersArizona Supreme Court· 1974-05-02· cited 8×
- State v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-05-22· cited 7×
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-03-10· cited 7×
- State v. RuizCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-01-12· cited 6×
- State v. SeiberIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-09-23· cited 6×
- State v. FasslerArizona Supreme Court· 1968-10-30· cited 6×
- State v. MendiblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-05-31· cited 5×
- State v. McMurtryCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-09-15· cited 5×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court· 1966-08-02· cited 109×
- People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-12-12· cited 38×
- State v. ParsonsArizona Supreme Court· 1950-10-02· cited 35×
- People v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-11-12· cited 34×
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1888-03-01· cited 23×
- People v. TellezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-04-17· cited 15×
- Porris v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1926-07-15· cited 14×
- The PEOPLE v. De StefanoIllinois Supreme Court· 1961-11-30· cited 13×
- The People v. NorrisIllinois Supreme Court· 1936-02-19· cited 12×
- Hurley v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1921-03-12· cited 12×
- People v. MainhurstCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-02-08· cited 11×
- Taylor v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1901-03-19· cited 11×
- State v. PerezArizona Supreme Court· 1963-07-03· cited 10×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-05-01· cited 9×
- People v. BucnisIllinois Supreme Court· 1950-03-22· cited 8×
- Impson v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1936-06-08· cited 6×
- Territory of Arizona v. CasioArizona Supreme Court· 1884-01-15· cited 5×
- Godbee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1938-09-24· cited 4×
- People v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-08-24· cited 4×
- West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1935-03-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.