Skip to main content

State v. Jackson

Citations

  • 420 P.2d 270
  • 101 Ariz. 399
  • 1966 Ariz. LEXIS 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining a wrongful taking of property without apparent intent to return it or explanatory circumstances indicates intent to permanently deprive
  • intent to permanently deprive can be inferred from unexplained or unsatisfactory explanation of taking property without consent
  • intent to permanently deprive can be inferred from unexplained or unsatisfactory explanation of taking property without consent
  • “The trial judge, in the absence of a satisfactory explanation, not only could have disregarded appellant’s testimony, but also could have inferred from its unsatisfactory nature, that there was no apparent intent to return the automobile.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Struckmeyer, Bernstein, Udall, Lockwood, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.