Skip to main content

State v. Jordan

Citations

  • 315 S.W.3d 660
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4589
  • 2010 WL 2428122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even though affidavit supported conclusion that defendant had been driving while intoxicated on some date, affidavit’s missing date left no fact from which magistrate could infer date
  • holding that even though affidavit supported conclusion that defendant had been driving while intoxicated on some date, affidavit‘s missing date left no fact from which magistrate could infer date
  • holding that even though affidavit supported conclusion that defendant had been driving while intoxicated on some date, affidavit’s missing date left no fact from which magistrate could infer date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Pemberton, Waldrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.