Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/21/1981
State v. Jordan
Citations
- 631 P.2d 989
- 29 Wash. App. 924
- 1981 Wash. App. LEXIS 2505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the fact occupants had not succeeded in completely closing curtains did not diminish the reasonableness of their expectation of privacy
- by drawing curtains, individuals inside duplex had clearly demonstrated a reasonable expectation of privacy
- by drawing curtains, individuals demonstrated an expectation of privacy, fact that occupants did not completely succeed in drawing curtains does not diminish the reasonableness of their expectation of privacy
- by drawing curtains, individuals inside duplex had clearly demonstrated a reasonable expectation of privacy
- by drawing curtains, individuals demonstrated an expectation of privacy, fact that occupants did not completely succeed in drawing curtains does not diminish the reasonableness of their expectation of privacy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Petrie, Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LudvikCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-11· cited 59×
- State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 53×
- State v. KealeyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-12-19· cited 45×
- State v. D.T.W.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-03· cited 42×
- State v. BerberCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-23· cited 26×
- State v. KealeyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-02-26· cited 10×
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-18· cited 9×
- United States v. $61,433.04 U.S. CurrencyE.D. North Carolina· 1995-04-06· cited 4×
- State v. DTWDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-03
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-06-20· cited 296×
- United States v. Calixto Agapito, Martha Calderon and Horacio RuedaSecond Circuit· 1980-03-12· cited 159×
- United States v. Earnest Jackson, Jr., and James Arthur Porter, IIIFifth Circuit· 1979-03-07· cited 133×
- United States v. Clifford HershNinth Circuit· 1972-07-07· cited 71×
- Anthony Paul Marullo v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1964-04-08· cited 45×
- State v. ManlyWashington Supreme Court· 1975-01-10· cited 36×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-11-12· cited 18×
- State v. GottSupreme Court of Missouri· 1970-07-13· cited 16×
- State v. SeagullCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-30· cited 13×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-08-12· cited 10×
- State v. GerryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-04-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.