State v. Ludvik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state game agent was not acting in official capacity when he viewed drug transactions from his home
• constitution protects \only against governmental actions and do[es] not require the application of the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained from private citizens acting on their own initiative.\
• “a mere purpose to aid the government does not transform an otherwise private search into a government search”
• “a mere purpose to aid the government does not transform an otherwise private search into a government search.”
• issue is whether, after excluding tainted evidence, affidavit establishes probable cause to uphold warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).