Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1997

Syllabus

The trial court conducted appellant's plea colloquy in accordance with Civ.R. 11(C). Appellant indicated his understanding of the terms of the plea agreement and did not object or ask any questions of the court or his counsel concerning the agreement. Appellant's argument on appeal that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered because he was denied effective assistance of counsel is without merit. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.