State v. Jones
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1997
Syllabus
The trial court conducted appellant's plea colloquy in accordance with Civ.R. 11(C). Appellant indicated his understanding of the terms of the plea agreement and did not object or ask any questions of the court or his counsel concerning the agreement. Appellant's argument on appeal that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered because he was denied effective assistance of counsel is without merit. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-26· cited 38×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 26×
- State v. LeonardOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.