South Dakota Supreme Court· 9/21/2011
State v. Jones
Citations
- 2011 S.D. 60
- 804 N.W.2d 409
- 2011 SD 60
- 2011 S.D. LEXIS 119
- 2011 WL 4395823
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When the language of a statute is clear, certain, and unambiguous, there is no occasion for construction, and this Court’s only function is to declare the meaning as clearly expressed in the statute.”
- “Because rape by intoxication is a serious felony and the Legislature has not indicated its clear intent to dispense with mens rea, [the state statute] must be read to include a knowledge element.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilbertson, Konenkamp, Meierhenry, Severson, Wilbur, Zinter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. James BruguierEighth Circuit· 2013-11-05· cited 42×
- State v. RoachSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-12-26· cited 30×
- State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-10-21· cited 30×
- State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-01-29· cited 25×
- State v. DiazSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-11-22· cited 20×
- State v. WhistlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-07-30· cited 10×
- State v. BeltSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-12-18· cited 7×
- State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-09-16· cited 6×
- State v. Mundy-GeiddSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-12-23· cited 4×
- State v. PfeifferSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-11-26· cited 4×
- State v. NekoliteSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-02-19· cited 2×
- State v. FidelerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-05-31· cited 1×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,491×
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 890×
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court· 2011-06-09· cited 825×
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court· 1922-03-27· cited 605×
- United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 339×
- Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 1910-05-31· cited 204×
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 166×
- Delano v. PetteysSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-08-10· cited 60×
- State v. FulksSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1968-07-24· cited 48×
- State v. NagelSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-06-14· cited 35×
- State v. GalatiSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-03-27· cited 34×
- State v. SchusterSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-06-23· cited 33×
- City of Sioux Falls v. EwoldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-08-20· cited 30×
- Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 30×
- In Re Appeal From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division, for AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-02-16· cited 29×
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Federated Mutual Insurance, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-26· cited 27×
- Jensen v. TURNER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-03-14· cited 25×
- State v. ReeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 22×
- People v. NasirMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-04-02· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.