South Dakota Supreme Court· 8/10/1994
Delano v. Petteys
Citations
- 520 N.W.2d 606
- 1994 S.D. LEXIS 124
- 1994 WL 419044
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the impact of a 1993 amendment to § 24-2-18 that rendered it similar to the current version
- \This court will not construe a statute in a way that renders parts to be duplicative and surplusage.\ (citing Farmland Ins. Co. v. Heitmann, 498 N.W.2d 620 (S.D.1993); Revier v. Sch. Bd. of Sioux Falls, 300 N.W.2d 55, 57 (S.D.1980))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amundson, Miller, Wuest, Henderson, Sabers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-01-06· cited 76×
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-12-20· cited 60×
- Zoss v. SchaefersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-08-04· cited 55×
- Matter of Estate of JetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-10-29· cited 48×
- State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-08-20· cited 45×
- Wildeboer v. South Dakota Junior Chamber of Commerce, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-03-26· cited 33×
- State v. McGillSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-08-16· cited 31×
- Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 30×
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Federated Mutual Insurance, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-26· cited 27×
- Brim v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-04-30· cited 25×
- Dahl v. WeberEighth Circuit· 2009-09-04· cited 24×
- Clark County v. Sioux Equipment Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-07-02· cited 21×
- State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-09-21· cited 19×
- State v. Tho Ngoc NguyenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-04-30· cited 18×
- Nielson v. AT & T CORP.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-28· cited 18×
- Delzer v. PennSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 15×
- In Re the Conditional Use Permit Denied to MeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-06-21· cited 14×
- Lewis v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-06-04· cited 13×
- Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. DaugaardD. South Dakota· 2011-06-30· cited 12×
- Lucero v. Van WieSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-08-11· cited 11×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 1,651×
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-04-25· cited 186×
- Douglas Charles Dufresne v. Benjamin Baer, Chairman, U.S. Parole CommissionEleventh Circuit· 1984-10-29· cited 72×
- Charles A. Damiano A/K/A Charles A. Damyn v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission and Jim Smith, the Attorney General of the State of FloridaEleventh Circuit· 1986-04-01· cited 71×
- Charles R. Warren v. United States Parole CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1981-07-01· cited 69×
- State v. HeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-04-22· cited 66×
- Farmland Insurance Companies of Des Moines v. HeitmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-04-07· cited 43×
- Albert E. Paschal v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.Eleventh Circuit· 1984-08-13· cited 35×
- Nelson v. School Board of the Hill City School District No. 51-2South Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-07-25· cited 33×
- John Morrell & Co. v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-07-25· cited 18×
- Errol B. Resnick v. United States Parole CommissionTenth Circuit· 1988-02-23· cited 16×
- Stumes v. DelanoSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-11-03· cited 16×
- Revier v. School Board of Sioux Falls School District 49-5South Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-01-16· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.