Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 107 P.2d 324
  • 44 N.M. 623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an attempt to separate cause from effect, being the consideration paid through a patron’s registration from the offer of prizes by chance, is an obvious subterfuge to avoid being recognized as a lottery
  • recognizingthat an attempt to separate cause from effect, being the consideration paid through a patron’s registration from the offer of prizes by chance, is an obvious subterfuge to avoid being recognized as a lottery
  • “Or, shall the defendants’ acts and conduct be judged by the then unreversed decision which stood as the best evidence of what the law was at the time the acts ... took place.”
  • reliance on prior law is critical issue when considering retroactive application
  • involving a movie theater bank night promotion
  • involving a movie theater bank night promotion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sadler, Bickley, Zinn, Brice, Mabry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.