State v. Pomroy.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred when it asked the defendant if he \understood that\ without clarifying to which right \that\ referenced
• holding that the trial court erred when it asked the defendant if he \understood that\ without clarifying to which right \that\ referenced
• noting that footnote seven in Tachibana \stated the purpose and substance of the right-to-testify colloquy\
• addressing evidentiary sufficiency after finding that the violation of constitutional right to testify was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
• finding the waiver to be invalid because the defendant repeatedly expressed doubt and uncertainty over what the trial court was telling him regarding his right-to- testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).