South Dakota Supreme Court· 9/14/1994
State v. Jones
Citations
- 521 N.W.2d 662
- 1994 S.D. LEXIS 148
- 1994 WL 502101
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining delay between arrest and trial of nearly fourteen months was presumptively prejudicial
- determining delay between arrest and trial of nearly fourteen months was presumptively prejudicial
- criminal procedure rules including right to speedy trial do not apply to juvenile proceedings because of different purpose served by juvenile system
- rejecting the idea that initial consent forecloses a rape prosecution
- declining to adopt the Vela analysis
- declining to adopt the Vela analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amundson, Henderson, Miller, Wuest, Sabers, Konenkamp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BunyardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-04-28· cited 59×
- State v. BabyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-04-16· cited 50×
- State v. CrimsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-11-28· cited 48×
- State v. KarlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-02-03· cited 46×
- State v. MulliganSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-07-11· cited 34×
- State v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-05-27· cited 33×
- State v. KlaudtSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-08-05· cited 33×
- People v. John Z.California Supreme Court· 2003-01-06· cited 33×
- State v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-06-05· cited 32×
- State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-07-29· cited 32×
- Rehm v. LenzSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-08· cited 31×
- State v. PasekSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-12-22· cited 30×
- State v. TiegenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-01-16· cited 26×
- State v. MotzkoSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-02-08· cited 19×
- State v. BurgersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-10-27· cited 17×
- In Re Thomas J.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-19· cited 16×
- In the Interests of S.K.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-01-13· cited 16×
- People Ex Rel. J.L.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-07-06· cited 12×
- People in Interest of YCSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-07-08· cited 10×
- Matter of Estate of TallmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-04-30· cited 8×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 2,564×
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
- McNair v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1992-01-24· cited 275×
- United States v. Arthur P. Tranakos, United States of America v. William PilgrimTenth Circuit· 1990-08-15· cited 83×
- Perlstein v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-12· cited 77×
- State v. WillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 74×
- United States Ex Rel. James A. Walker v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility,respondent-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1974-01-07· cited 58×
- State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-03-02· cited 55×
- State v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 54×
- State v. BlalackSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-12-14· cited 52×
- State v. HarrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-01-06· cited 51×
- State v. LohnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-09-15· cited 44×
- United States v. William Donald Shepherd and Barbara Shepherd, Formerly Known as BarbararichardFifth Circuit· 1975-05-23· cited 42×
- State v. HavensSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-04-12· cited 42×
- State v. GallipoSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-09-05· cited 40×
- People in Interest of LVASouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.