Oregon Supreme Court· 8/14/2008
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 191 P.3d 665
- 345 Or. 190
- 2008 Ore. LEXIS 598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- law was facially unconstitutional in part because it lacked an imminency requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ViranondOregon Supreme Court· 2009-07-16· cited 11×
- State v. BabsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-11· cited 8×
- State v. EnemesioCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-06· cited 7×
- Blachana, LLC v. Oregon Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-23· cited 6×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-27· cited 6×
- State v. KoenigCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 5×
- State v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 4×
- State v. SorrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-11· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-03-03· cited 1,079×
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court· 1982-08-03· cited 334×
- State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court· 1985-08-27· cited 152×
- State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court· 1992-08-27· cited 123×
- State v. CiancanelliOregon Supreme Court· 2005-09-29· cited 69×
- State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 65×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.