State v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, on balance, the judicial economy policy underlying the doctrine does not justify invoking collateral estoppel in that case
• concluding that doctrine of collateral estoppel could not be applied offensively in perjury prosecution so as to preclude litigation of primary substantive issue involving a specific finding of fact made by a jury in a prior criminal trial against the defendant
• collateral estoppel in criminal setting must be applied “with realism and rationality,” and not hypertechnically

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Scarbrough
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2005-11-30· cited 39×
• People v. Goss
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 32×
• State v. Cassady
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-07-24· cited 31×
• Gutierrez v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-04-15· cited 20×
• State v. Hewins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-07-16· cited 19×
• Trovato v. Deveau
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-04-21· cited 12×
• Bruzga's Case
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-05-11· cited 9×
• People v. Goss
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-06-07· cited 8×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-28· cited 4×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 3×
• People v. Morrison
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-11-30· cited 1×
• State of Tennessee v. David Scarbrough
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2005-11-30

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashe v. Swenson
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
• Standefer v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
• State v. Ingenito
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-27· cited 171×
• Francisco Pena-Cabanillas v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1968-04-24· cited 137×
• Daigle v. City of Portsmouth
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-08-06· cited 103×
• United States v. De Angelo
  Third Circuit· 1943-10-28· cited 86×
• United States v. F. W. Standefer
  Third Circuit· 1979-10-11· cited 78×
• Alfredo Efren Hernandez-Uribe v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 1975-05-28· cited 49×
• People v. Majado
  California Court of Appeal· 1937-08-17· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Ellis
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1893-11-28· cited 39×
• United States v. Jaime Bejar-Matrecios
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-06-11· cited 38×
• United States v. Rangel-Perez
  S.D. California· 1959-12-09· cited 35×
• Hopps v. Utica Mutual Insurance
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-12-31· cited 26×
• United States v. Panetta
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-06-24· cited 19×
• State v. Stiefel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-01-12· cited 18×
• People v. Longuemire
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-12-05· cited 16×
• State v. Fielders
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-27· cited 10×
• State v. Kaplan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-29· cited 9×
• State v. Collins
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1990-10-17· cited 6×
• State v. Arlin
  Superior Court of New Hampshire· 1853-12-15· cited 2×