Skip to main content

Bruzga's Case

Citations

  • 142 N.H. 743
  • 712 A.2d 1078
  • 1998 N.H. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in .future cases, offensive collateral estoppel may be used in bar discipline proceedings when a prior proceeding employed a burden of proof equaling or exceeding the clear and convincing burden governing bar discipline proceedings
  • doctrine of collateral estoppel may be applied in attorney discipline proceedings when prior proceeding subject to burden of proof equaling or exceeding the burden governing disciplinary proceedings
  • “We hold that the doctrine of offensive collateral estoppel may be applied in attorney discipline proceedings when a prior proceeding was subject to a burden of proof equaling or exceeding the clear and convincing burden governing disciplinary proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broderick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.