Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/13/2014

State v. Johnson

Citations

299 Kan. 890
327 P.3d 421
2014 WL 2619909
2014 Kan. LEXIS 283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding arguments broad enough to encompass appellate arguments, even if they are ambiguous, are properly before appellate court's review
if party’s arguments to district court were sufficiently broad to encompass his or her appellate arguments, we will consider them for first time on appeal
specifically rejecting the notion of denying the DNA test on the basis of the weight of the evidence
DNA testing for third party biological material on a knife would not be exculpatory because the presence of third party did not undermine the defendant's undisputed guilt
\'DNA testing is intended to confirm or dispute the identity of individuals involved in or at the scene of a purported crime.' So DNA evidence may be exculpatory if it tends to establish innocence based on an individual's identity. [Citation omitted.]\
\'DNA testing is intended to confirm or dispute the identity of individuals involved in or at the scene of a purported crime.' [Citation omitted.] So DNA evidence may be exculpatory if it tends to establish innocence based on an individual's identity.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.