State v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in its case, “editorializing on the facts could be considered as urging consecutive over concurrent sentences” in violation of the plea agreement
• “editorializing” on facts may be improper when State agrees to take no position on portion of sentence
• “A less than truthful soft pedaling or whitewashing of tire extent of defendant’s participation in stating the facts to the court would have been inappropriate.”
• “In speaking to the court, the State had the right to and did state the extent of defendant’s participation in the crimes. A less than truthful soft pedaling or whitewashing of the extent of defendant’s participation in stating the facts to die court would have been inappropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Urista
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-02-08· cited 52×
• State v. Peterson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-02-08· cited 25×
• State v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-04-11· cited 13×
• State v. Chesbro
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-05-12· cited 13×
• State v. High
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-07-12· cited 11×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-12-08· cited 10×
• McGoldrick v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-01-21· cited 7×
• State v. Urista
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-12-17· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santobello v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
• United States v. Edgardo Giorgi, United States of America v. Gilberto Ocasio-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez
  First Circuit· 1988-04-14· cited 116×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-10-26· cited 31×