Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/13/2022

State v. Johnson

Citations

2022 Ohio 81

Syllabus

Petition for postconviction relief recantation successive untimely abuse of discretion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's successive and untimely petition for postconviction relief, based on an alleged recantation of witness testimony, because appellant was unable to show that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the recantation and unable to establish a constitutional error.

Judges: Kilbane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court· 2024-01-18· cited 29×
State v. Everson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-25· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
State v. Calhoun
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
State v. Jackson
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-12-17· cited 791×
State v. Gondor
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
State v. Steffen
Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 454×
State v. Nolan (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-05· cited 54×
State v. Johnson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-13· cited 43×
United States v. Earles
N.D. Iowa· 1997-11-04· cited 24×
State v. Mackey
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-09· cited 13×
State v. Watson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-17· cited 10×
State v. Parker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-19· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.