State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 568
Syllabus
Resentencing mandate restitution nunc pro tunc waiver of jury trial res judicata allied offenses ineffective assistance of counsel. - Trial court exceeded the mandate for resentencing upon remand but its error was harmless because it did not alter the valid and final sentences imposed at the original sentencing trial court ordered to enter nunc pro tunc entry because although trial court did not order restitution at resentencing, the resentencing entry ordered defendant to pay restitution defendant's arguments regarding his waiver of a jury trial, allied offenses, lesser included offenses, and ineffective assistance of counsel were all barred by res judicata because they could have been raised on direct appeal.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 773×
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-16· cited 189×
- State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court· 2009-07-07· cited 160×
- State v. LomaxOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-05· cited 85×
- State v. LeGrantOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-31· cited 35×
- State v. CrawleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-13· cited 5×
- State v. FontanezOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.