State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3968
Syllabus
CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING/FINES, RESTITUTION, EXPUNGEMENT - trial court satisfies its obligation to consider the sentencing criteria in R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12 by stating it considered them trial court is merely required to consider the purposes and principles of felony sentencing in R.C. 2929.11 it is not required to impose a less burdensome sentencing option R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) does not require that the trial court make the consecutive sentence findings in any particular order. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - counsel's failure to request discovery does not place his performance outside wide range of reasonable professional assistance appellant must establish prejudice resulting from counsel's failure to request discovery.
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. VenesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-09· cited 321×
- State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court· 2009-12-02· cited 306×
- State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 15×
- State v. StrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-25· cited 7×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.