Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/30/2008

State v. Johnson

Citations

190 P.3d 455
221 Or. App. 394
2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[l]ess process is due at a revocation hearing than during a criminal trial”
holding that a defendant’s probation file was admissible
holding, following application of a four-part balancing test, that the admission of hearsay evidence in a probation revocation proceeding did not violate the probationer’s Fourteenth Amendment due process confrontation rights
reviewing admission of hearsay evidence over a defendant’s due process objection at a probation revocation proceeding for errors of law
“[T]he trial court at a probation revocation hearing may consider documentary evidence that does not meet usual evidentiary requirements.”
allowing use of probation officer’s affidavit in probation violation hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Ortega, Carson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.