Skip to main content
· 11/17/2010

State v. Wibbens

Citations

  • 243 P.3d 790
  • 238 Or. App. 737
  • 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that whether “admission of hear- say evidence at a probation revocation proceeding violates a probationer’s right to confrontation” involves weighing “the probationer’s interest in confrontation against the govern- ment’s good cause for denying it”
  • “The rele- vant factors in that analysis include ‘(1) the importance of the evidence to the court’s finding; (2) the probationer’s opportu- nity to refute the evidence; (3) the difficulty and expense of obtaining witnesses; and (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Presiding Judge, and Ortega, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.