Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/27/2005

State v. Johnson

Citations

111 P.3d 1038
210 Ariz. 438
452 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
2005 Ariz. App. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding no error when the court considered an aggravating factor not found by the jury but sentenced the defendant to presumptive terms
finding no error when the trial court considered an aggravating circumstance not found by the jury because it did not rely on that circumstance to increase the defendant’s punishment beyond the presumptive term
no error when court considered aggravating factor not found by jury but sentenced defendant to presumptive terms
“[T]he maximum punishment authorized by a jury verdict alone, without a finding of additional facts, is the presumptive term.”
“[T]he trial court was not required to specify either aggravating factors or mitigating factors in imposing presumptive sentences . . . .”
judicial fact-finding does not violate Blakely if ultimate sentence does not exceed maximum authorized by jury verdict alone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eckerstrom, Howard, Brammer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.