State v. Urquidez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it would have been factually impossible for the defendant, a prohibited possessor, to commit aggravated assault with a deadly weapon without also committing prohibited possession of a deadly weapon
• fact defendant fired gun at victim’s vehicle remained after his pointing gun at victim subtracted
• \We review de novo a trial court's decision to impose consecutive sentences in accordance with A.R.S. § 13-116.\
• the trial court was not required to impose concurrent sentences “[b]ecause two of the three Gordon factors weigh in favor of viewing the two crimes as multiple acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).