State v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that substantial state interests described in Bartylla exist equally with regard to adults convicted of misdemeanor offenses
• addressing adult mis-demeanant subject to DNA collection under same statute
• finding similar arguments to be unpersuasive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-01-25· cited 37×
• In re the Welfare of M.L.M.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-01-25· cited 10×
• In Re the Welfare of M.L.M.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-04-20· cited 5×
• STUDOR, INC. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-04-27· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennsylvania v. Mimms
  Supreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
• United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
• Kahn v. Griffin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-11· cited 94×
• State v. Bartylla
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-21· cited 90×
• Miller Brewing Co. v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-06-15· cited 81×
• State v. Behl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 66×
• State v. O'HAGEN
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-01-24· cited 53×
• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-07-15· cited 34×
• State v. Melde
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-12-21· cited 28×
• In Re Welfare of C.T.L.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-10-10· cited 14×
• St. Cloud Police Relief Ass'n v. City of St. Cloud
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-11-05· cited 11×
• United States v. Pool
  E.D. California· 2009-05-27· cited 9×