Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 5/4/2004
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 679 N.W.2d 169
- 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 478
- 2004 WL 950261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the risk of relying on potentially untrustworthy hearsay evidence will be greatly minimized because the reliability of hearsay evidence will be weighed against other evidence
- determining that the rules of evidence do not preclude the admission of hearsay evidence in a probation-revocation hearing when a defendant has had ample opportunity to present evidence
- affirming revocation of DWI offender’s probation after offender failed to complete aftercare for chemical-dependency treatment, failed to 6 attend an impact-panel discussion pertaining to driving under the influence, and failed to refrain from consuming alcohol
- “When the defendant has had ample opportunity to present evidence in a probation revocation hearing, the rules of evidence do not preclude admission of hearsay evidence . . . .”
- allowing admission of hearsay evidence in probation revocation proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shumaker, Kalitowski, Minge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 156×
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 128×
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-11-06· cited 79×
- State v. LloydSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-24· cited 57×
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-02-16· cited 41×
- People v. ManzanaresColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-10-09· cited 32×
- Marshall v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1982-06-18· cited 16×
- State v. AubidSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-08· cited 15×
- In Re the Welfare of L.Z.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-11-21· cited 13×
- State v. VerdoliniConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-29· cited 9×
- Staley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 7×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-06-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.