Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 679 N.W.2d 169
  • 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 478
  • 2004 WL 950261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the risk of relying on potentially untrustworthy hearsay evidence will be greatly minimized because the reliability of hearsay evidence will be weighed against other evidence
  • determining that the rules of evidence do not preclude the admission of hearsay evidence in a probation-revocation hearing when a defendant has had ample opportunity to present evidence
  • affirming revocation of DWI offender’s probation after offender failed to complete aftercare for chemical-dependency treatment, failed to 6 attend an impact-panel discussion pertaining to driving under the influence, and failed to refrain from consuming alcohol
  • “When the defendant has had ample opportunity to present evidence in a probation revocation hearing, the rules of evidence do not preclude admission of hearsay evidence . . . .”
  • allowing admission of hearsay evidence in probation revocation proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shumaker, Kalitowski, Minge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.