State of Minnesota v. Donald Eldon Lamont

Syllabus

In this appeal from an order revoking probation and executing a 60-month sentence, appellant Donald Eldon Lamont argues that (1) the district court abused its discretion in admitting hearsay evidence, and (2) the record does not support revoking his probation and executing his sentence. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the challenged evidence or in revoking probation, we affirm.