State v. Jenkins
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 5409
Syllabus
Any error in the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to compel the production of information pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) was harmless. Nothing in the record indicates that information from the alleged victims' cell phones was material to the offense of having weapons while under disability, the only offense of which appellant was convicted. The trial court's imposition of a maximum 36-month sentence was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
- State v. LeopardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
- State v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-02· cited 44×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Kellogg-MartinOhio Supreme Court· 2010-02-04· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.