Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/14/2003
State v. James
Citations
- 583 S.E.2d 745
- 355 S.C. 25
- 2003 S.C. LEXIS 153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting Hamilton and Benton do not nullify the trial court's \traditional role in weighing the probative value of evidence versus its prejudicial effect or suggest that Rule 403 is displaced by operation of section 16-11- 311(A)(2)\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones, Kittredge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-06-04· cited 137×
- Anderson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2009-01-22· cited 17×
- State v. KeenonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-12-08· cited 5×
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-06-06· cited 1×
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-02-23
- State v. CrossSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-07-24
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-06-03
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-06-01
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 69×
- Carlyle Ex Rel. Estate of Carlyle v. Tuomey HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-07-22· cited 28×
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-16· cited 26×
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-11-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.