Skip to main content
· 7/22/1991

Carlyle Ex Rel. Estate of Carlyle v. Tuomey Hospital

Citations

  • 407 S.E.2d 630
  • 305 S.C. 187
  • 1991 S.C. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating proof that an error caused the appellant prejudice is a prerequisite to reversal based on error where the trial court’s discretion is involved
  • absent showing of clear abuse of discretion, trial court's admission or rejection of evidence is not subject to reversal on appeal
  • proof that an error caused the appellant prejudice is a prerequisite to reversal based on error where the trial court’s discretion is involved
  • “Proof that an error caused the appellant prejudice is a prerequisite to reversal based on error where the trial court’s discretion is involved.”
  • absent showing of clear abuse of discretion, trial court’s admission or rejection of evidence is not subject to reversal on appeal
  • The jury must be presented with all evidence from which it can make a logical, well informed decision. A jury’s verdict cannot “be left to conjecture, guess or speculation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.