· 7/22/1991
Carlyle Ex Rel. Estate of Carlyle v. Tuomey Hospital
Citations
- 407 S.E.2d 630
- 305 S.C. 187
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating proof that an error caused the appellant prejudice is a prerequisite to reversal based on error where the trial courts discretion is involved
- absent showing of clear abuse of discretion, trial court's admission or rejection of evidence is not subject to reversal on appeal
- proof that an error caused the appellant prejudice is a prerequisite to reversal based on error where the trial court’s discretion is involved
- “Proof that an error caused the appellant prejudice is a prerequisite to reversal based on error where the trial court’s discretion is involved.”
- absent showing of clear abuse of discretion, trial court’s admission or rejection of evidence is not subject to reversal on appeal
- The jury must be presented with all evidence from which it can make a logical, well informed decision. A jury’s verdict cannot “be left to conjecture, guess or speculation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.