Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 6/19/1991
State v. Jacobs
Citations
- 591 A.2d 252
- 87 Md. App. 640
- 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that testimony of the officer's subjective good faith reliance on a warrant is not appropriate to consider when determining whether the good faith exception applies to a given case
- “It is for us ... to determine the legal significance of those facts-whether they demonstrate that the officer acted in good faith. We shall therefore ... make our own independent evaluation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 1,306×
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 986×
- Riddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 173×
- Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-10· cited 153×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-08-11· cited 87×
- Connelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-05-13· cited 40×
- Whitman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-04-03· cited 27×
- Yeagy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-05-09· cited 23×
- Davidson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-12· cited 8×
- Connelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.