State v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “to convict for the offense of Operating a Vehicle After Being Adjudged a Habitual Traffic Violator, the State must prove that the suspended driver operated a vehicle while knowing that his license was suspended”
• “[I]n the absence of direct proof of a driver’s lack of knowledge, the statute directs that the State may presumptively satisfy the knowledge element by establishing proper notice to a driver’s last address in the Bureau’s records, subject to rebuttal by the accused driver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beattie v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2010-04-08· cited 91×
• Michael J. Lock v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2012-07-26· cited 85×
• Israel Cruz v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-12-31· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stewart v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-12-30· cited 27×
• State v. Hammond
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-28· cited 23×
• State v. Casada
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-04-22· cited 20×
• State v. O'GRADY
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-11-16· cited 5×
• State v. Jackson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-04-20· cited 4×