Skip to main content
· 4/22/2005

State v. Casada

Citations

  • 825 N.E.2d 936
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 650
  • 2005 WL 928420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that despite trial court’s erroneous grant of defendant’s judgment on the evidence, defendant could not be retried because the grant acted as an acquittal for purposes of double jeopardy
  • affirming conviction of a defendant who admitted to a deputy that he knew he should have reported his address to local law enforcement authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.