· 4/22/2005
State v. Casada
Citations
- 825 N.E.2d 936
- 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 650
- 2005 WL 928420
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that despite trial court’s erroneous grant of defendant’s judgment on the evidence, defendant could not be retried because the grant acted as an acquittal for purposes of double jeopardy
- affirming conviction of a defendant who admitted to a deputy that he knew he should have reported his address to local law enforcement authority
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.