Washington Supreme Court· 7/16/2020

State v. Jackson

Citations

195 Wash. 2d 841
467 P.3d 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a trial court must engage in an individualized inquiry and consider several factors to determine whether a defendant should be restrained
explaining that a trial court’s decision to require a criminal defendant to wear restraints at trial is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
remanding for a new trial based on a trial court’s failure to make an individualized inquiry into the necessity of leg braces under a defendant’s clothes
examining whether error was harmless after first determining that the appellant established unconstitutional shackling
examining whether error was harmless after first determining that the appellant established unconstitutional shackling
“use of blanket jail policies and shacking without an individualized inquiry” violates “established law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.