Skip to main content

State v. Jackson

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 2677

Syllabus

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a mistrial where the prosecutor's comments did not interfere with appellant's right to a fair trial by an impartial jury. The trial court also did not abuse its discretion in admitting an exhibit which was properly authenticated through witness testimony. The trial court properly denied appellant's motion to suppress where the incriminating nature of the evidence was immediately apparent and the evidence was in plain view.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.