Skip to main content

State v. Jackson

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3299

Syllabus

SENTENCING: The trial court erred where it failed during the sentencing hearing to make two of the three findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) for imposing consecutive sentences, and the cause must be remanded for a new sentencing hearing on that issue even though the court made all three findings in its sentencing entry. The trial court properly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing in R.C. 2929.11 and the felony sentencing factors of R.C. 2929.12 in sentencing defendant. Defendant's sentences for each individual count are supported by the record and are not contrary to law, but the cause must be remanded for the trial court to properly make the consecutive sentencing findings.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.