State v. Jackson

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 7167

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences findings. Appellant's consecutive sentences are affirmed as this court is able to discern that the trial court engaged in the correct analysis under R.C. 2929.14(C) and to determine that the record contains evidence regarding appellant's lengthy and extensive criminal history to support the trial court's consecutive findings. The case, however, is remanded to the trial court for the trial court to issue a new sentencing journal entry, nunc pro tunc, to incorporate into the journal entry the statutory findings made by the trial court at the sentencing hearing.