State v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the prosecutor’s possession of [the defendant’s] Garrity statement during trial preparation constituted an improper use within the meaning of Garrity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Swing
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-02· cited 29×
• State v. Graham
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-05-29· cited 24×
• State v. Kuruc
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-05· cited 6×
• State v. Gideon
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-24· cited 5×
• State v. Schimmel
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-22· cited 3×
• State v. Jackson
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-05-05
• State v. Flynn
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-13
• Kristin Ward v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-10-31

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Colorado v. Connelly
  Supreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
• Kastigar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
• Hoffman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1951-05-28· cited 1,874×
• Garrity v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 1,543×
• Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 1,503×
• United States v. Hubbell
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 375×
• Jeffrey McKinley v. City of Mansfield
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-04-11· cited 177×
• United States v. Gary R. McDaniel
  Eighth Circuit· 1973-07-31· cited 139×
• United States v. Thomas E. Byrd
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-07-23· cited 87×
• United States v. Dominic Mariani
  Second Circuit· 1988-07-11· cited 54×
• United States v. Bartholomew Rivieccio
  Second Circuit· 1990-11-02· cited 34×
• State v. Conrad
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-03-21· cited 21×