United States v. Bartholomew Rivieccio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \any misuse of the immunized testimony which may have occurred before the indicting Grand Jury was rendered harmless” because at trial \the Government did not use, either directly or indirectly,” any immunized testimony before the convicting petit jury
• “To the extent the Government’s thought process or questioning of witnesses may have been influenced by Appellant’s immunized testimony, we hold that any such use was merely tangential and was therefore not a prohibited use.”
• “To the extent the Government’s thought process or questioning of witnesses may have been influenced by Appellant’s immunized testimony, we hold that any such use was merely tangential and was therefore not a prohibited use.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).