Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/9/2005
State v. Jackson
Citations
- 613 S.E.2d 374
- 364 S.C. 329
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellant waived any argument he had when he acquiesced the next morning and stated he would ask witness if he had administered a polygraph and \leave it at that\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Toal, Burnett, Pleicones, Westbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HolderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-05-04· cited 49×
- State v. McEachernCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 26×
- State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-14· cited 17×
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-29· cited 9×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-03-25
- Jeane Whitfield v. Dennis K. SchimpfSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2025-01-08
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 119×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 83×
- State v. KornahrensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-10-13· cited 73×
- State v. BrazellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 63×
- State v. LocklairSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 49×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 45×
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-06-12· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.