State v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the materiality of a destroyed videotape held established where an assistant solicitor based the decision to drop the charges against the defendant because of the videotape
• defense counsel subpoenaed police officers for two separate hearings, but the officers never appeared
• defense counsel subpoenaed police officers for two separate hearings, but the officers never appeared

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Napper
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-29· cited 207×
• State v. Cheeseboro
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-27· cited 115×
• State v. Singleton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-08-07· cited 19×
• State v. Mabe
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-09· cited 11×
• State v. Belviso
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-01· cited 5×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-04-08· cited 4×
• Napper, Ex Parte Lawrence James
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-29

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• United States v. Agurs
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
• California v. Trombetta
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
• Arizona v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
• United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×