Wisconsin Supreme Court· 6/27/1984

State v. Ivy

Citations

350 N.W.2d 622
119 Wis. 2d 591
1984 Wisc. LEXIS 2598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that when an appellate court determines that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction the remedy is to order a judgment of acquittal, citing Burks, 437 U.S. at 18
to be guilty of armed robbery as accomplice, defendant must have “known or believed” that principal would carry weapon
\[L]egal intent may be inferred from conduct. One is presumed to intend natural and probable consequences of his act.\ (citation omitted)
appellate court must address sufficiency of the evidence issue when reversing on other grounds for purposes of double jeopardy
“proof of intent is not required for conviction of the different offense if the offense was the natural and probable consequence of the intended crime to which the defendant was a party”
\proof of intent is not required for conviction of the different offense if the offense was the natural and probable consequence of the intended crime to which the defendant was a party\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William A. Bablitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.