State v. Irish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s constitutional challenge to the revocation of his intensive supervision was moot because he had been released from institutional confinement
• “The test generally used to determine mootness is whether there remain sufficient practical effects flowing from the resolution of the litigation to justify application of limited judicial resources.”
• \courts should decline to decide issues which by virtue of valid and recognizable supervening circumstances have lost their controversial vitality.\ (quoting State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573, 578 (Me. 1979

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John Doe I v. Robert Williams
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-03-05· cited 72×
• Lewiston Daily Sun v. School Administrative District No. 43
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-10-18· cited 57×
• Ten Voters of Biddeford v. City of Biddeford
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-04-25· cited 31×
• State v. Jordan
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-07-14· cited 17×
• Bureau of Employee Relations v. Maine Labor Relations Board
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-02-23· cited 11×
• Lewis v. State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-03-10· cited 10×
• Dyer v. Town of Cumberland
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-10-21· cited 5×
• State v. Snowman
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-08-08· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gleason
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-07-31· cited 74×
• Bennett v. State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1972-03-29· cited 18×