New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 10/4/1971

State v. Infante

Citations

282 A.2d 44
116 N.J. Super. 252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting \[t]he identity of the informer must be disclosed when it is necessary and relevant to a fair defense\
explaining that when an officer conducts an \overhear\ of a telephone call and hears both ends of the call, the content of the call is \within the detective's personal knowledge and not the result of information conveyed to him\
upholding the denial of defendant's motion for disclosure as \[t]he informant's participation was not in the criminal activity for which defendant was convicted but rather in A-0540-18T4 10 the investigation leading up to surveillance.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Kilkenny, Labrecque and Lane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.