Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/21/1977
State v. Hyde
Citations
- 561 P.2d 659
- 28 Or. App. 809
- 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is for the jury, not the court, to resolve conflicting evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwab, C.J., and Tanzer and Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-04-02· cited 52×
- Roshak v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court· 1977-02-17· cited 32×
- Castor v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court· 1977-02-17· cited 12×
- State of Oregon v. MonkOregon Supreme Court· 1953-08-12· cited 12×
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-12-20· cited 4×
- State v. ChapmanOregon Supreme Court· 1969-06-18· cited 3×
- State v. ChinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-03-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.