State v. Huynh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \An element dealing with a defendant's subjective mental state generally cannot be the subject of an alternative means analysis.\
• “An element dealing with a defendant’s subjective mental state generally cannot be the subject of an alternative means analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Washington v. Christopher Lee McCabe
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-04-06· cited 7×
• State v. Sony
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-17· cited 6×
• State Of Washington v. Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-06-27· cited 3×
• State Of Washington v. Generous Sony
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-17

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Emery
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-06-14· cited 1,088×
• State v. Scott
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
• State v. Kitchen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
• State v. Arndt
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-08-05· cited 245×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 151×
• State v. Bythrow
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 129×
• State v. Peterson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-05-06· cited 85×
• State v. Linehan
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-10-24· cited 71×
• State v. Medina
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-13· cited 41×
• State v. Laico
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-01· cited 36×
• State v. Medina
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-27· cited 27×
• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-20· cited 20×