Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 9/13/2000

State v. Hurd

Citations

  • 89 Ohio St. 3d 616
  • 734 N.E.2d 365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a court's first step when considering the meaning of a statute \is always to determine whether the statute is 'plain and unambiguous' \
  • ‘When a statute is plain and unambiguous ... there is no occasion for resorting to rules of statutory interpretation.”
  • “When a statute is plain and unambiguous ... there is no occasion for resorting to rules of statutory interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.