Skip to main content
· 12/28/2023

G.A.I. Capital Group v. Lisowski

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4802

Syllabus

contract interpretation de novo review plain language corporate liability definition of members manifest weight of the evidence bench trial case flow management statute of frauds and the statute of conveyances

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that factual allegations in the charge describing instances of physical harassment and discriminatory denial of compensation were capable of supporting claims of both sex and national origin discrimination
  • concluding that the plaintiff could add a claim of national origin discrimination because the facts in her original charge supported such a claim
  • holding that a Title VII complaint may encompass discrimination like or related to allegations contained in the EEOC charge and growing out of such allegations during the pendency of the case before the Commission
  • noting that \the filing of a charge of discrimination with the EEOC is a condition precedent to the bringing of a civil action under Title VII\
  • noting that the allegations in a judicial complaint filed pursuant to Title VII may encompass any kind of discrimination like or related to the allegations contained in the charge
  • explaining that a Title VII complaint may encompass only the kinds of discrimination like or related to the allegations contained in the EEOC charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.